(1 / 4)
Date: February 05, 1990 15:46
From: CHARM::SUTTLES
To: MARGOLIN
CC: SUTTLES
PLEASE! DO NOT take your printouts from the middle of the pile without taking care of the pile. The baskets will only start to stack printouts if they are empty. They will continue to stack if you leave them alone (and luck is with them) but you, yes you, personally guarantee that every printout after the one you dig for will be mangled if you don't take care of the whole pile. This still applies if yours is the last job. If you can take the time to find your job, then you have time to empty the basket. If you don't, it still dumps the following listings on the floor. I find it interesting to note that every time this happens, ALL banner pages are removed which identify the culprit. I have had it with cleaning up the room after others; since I can tell who the culprit is by other means, I'll send them this annoying message for a few times, and if that doesn't work, I'll let the public know. None of this is new. sas
(2 / 4)
Date: February 06, 1990 13:20
From: SANDY::MARGOLIN
To: SUTTLES
CC: MARGOLIN
I am guilty. Yesterday, I removed a listing from the Spinwriter and did not remove, separate, and stack the couple of listings in the basket. One reason for this is because I am frequently unsuccessful in separating the paper without it tearing. I assume that people use the Spinwriter because they are going to use the printout for something reasonably important. I am surprised to learn that the output from the Spinwriter is so volumious that it spills out onto the floor. I am puzzled by your reference to the header sheets being missing, thereby making it difficult for you to trace the culprit. I have never seen the Spinwriter produce a header sheet. Are we both talking about the Spinwriter in the Printer Room or have I been missing something? I do observe proper printer etiquette regarding the Printronix printers. As long as we are on the subject of the Printer Room, it would be nice to have a working terminal in the Printer Room or its vicinity, for those times when something gets screwed up and I need to log on to get a listing. (My office is a long way from the Printer Room.) It would also be nice to add an additional terminal to the DIO Room so that both the 288 and the 29 can be used at the same time. Regards, Jed
(3 / 4)
Date: February 06, 1990 13:43
From: KIM::SUTTLES
To: SANDY::MARGOLIN
CC: SUTTLES
With reference to the header sheets, it is a stock message. As you correctly infer, the problem applies more often to the Printronix printers than it does to the spinwriter. However, as you also point out, anyone wanting printouts worthy of retention uses the spinwriter; unfortunately, this includes printouts of online documentation, and quite a few people use it for printing mail message, status reports, and general memos. It does indeed spill out onto the floor. It would cure the stacking problem if you would simply remove the detritus from the basket and put it on the shelves. It is assumed that when people pick up their listings, they check for a complete listing. Finding an appendix, it would only be reasonable to assume they would remove the others' listings from their own, and leave them for the others involved. The reason I sent the message (the reason I send it every time I do so) is because there were enough printouts following the missing one to cause problems. Admittedly, this is contrary to general supposition (nobody thinks we use that printer, but we go through more supplies for that one than both printronix combined. With regards to a terminal in the printer room, there is one. It is usually powered off because it has a problem with overheating. It is across from the Spinwriter. With regards to another terminal in the Data I/O room, there are already two in place. We have eight ports tied up with the current configuration, because we have to provide DIO support when either Kim or Charm is down; four ports are present for each system. In order to add a terminal to control the other DIO at the same time would require the addition of four more ports (a terminal and a device port on each of two systems). We don't have the wiring, the free ports, or any working terminals to support this, and we also lack the space to put the equipment if we did. Lastly, the usage is highly sporadic. The 29 can go for a week without any usage, and then the biggest obstacle to getting it is other people using it, not the 288. If you find a problem using the 29 because of 288 users, you might point out to them that there is another 288 near Ed Logg's lab, with an associated terminal. sas
(4 / 4)
Date: February 06, 1990 14:43
From: SANDY::MARGOLIN
To: SUTTLES
CC: MARGOLIN
Since you want me to handle Spinwriter listings already in the basket on those few times I use the Spinwriter, then fine, I will be happy to. Since you don't want to put in a separate terminal in the DIO Room for the 29, then fine, I will handle being frustrated when I come to use it and find it the 288 occupied by somebody whose ROMs are done but they are nowhere to be found. BUT, don't tell me the terminal in the Printer Room is functional, because it is NOT. Yesterday, I tried to use it; the screen is too dim. And even when it was working, it didn't work properly. Regards, Jed
Feb 05, 1990