(1 / 6)
Date: July 26, 1988 11:42
From: ERNIE::OHARA
To: @SYS$MAIL:JUNK,OHARA
An accident happened today when the shredding was put out for Mobile Shredding to shred, it was thrown in the dumpster! This was an unfortunate misunderstanding but the question been asked if it is necessary to search thru the muck to retrieve it, so it can be shredded before throwing it away. I don't know so I'm asking for your opinion; send replies to OHARA, or a note in the mail will do and I will forward them on and keep record for future reference. While I'm on my soapbox a couple of other points: A. I see no reason why end sheets need to be shredded, yet 1/3 to 1/2 of the shredding I pick up is just the sheets that come at the end of listings and such. This cost the company $25 to 35 worth of corporate money each month or so ($400 a year or more). B. The shredding is not trash despite the fact that it eventually ends up there, I do not appreciate the candy wrappers and such that seem to find their way into the shredding. enuff said and apologies to those who don't need to hear this james
(2 / 6)
Date: July 26, 1988 13:19
From: KIM::MARGOLIN
To: OHARA,MARGOLIN
Item 1: Let me see if I have this right. You want to use expensive Programmers' time to separate the end sheets of program listings so you can save $25 per month? Also, I disagree that the end sheets are unimportant. The end sheets would allow an individual to know what programs people are working on. People generally choose program titles representative of their content. The end sheets would tell an industrial spy what programs to target for acquisition. I expect you are already saving more than $25 per month from the execrable printer paper you bought. Item 2: As I understand it, the reason for shredding things is to prevent them from falling into the hands of our competitors. I use the shred pile to get rid of old schematics (although, fortunately, not this month). I would not like the result of my last two years' work wasted because you did not think it was all that important to have things properly shredded.
(3 / 6)
Date: July 26, 1988 14:07
From: ERNIE::OHARA
To: KIM::MARGOLIN,OHARA
I do not intend to make the programmers rip sheets off some people do as a matter of course. I agree with your point about the names it didn't occur to me until now. I, however, break my back weekly cleaning up the mess in the printer room and sometimes this gets to me. Further, is my time more valuable picking up what may not be confidential (not everything is) proctecting it from some hypothetical 'spy' or is it more valuable for me to make sure everyone is properly supplied? As far as the 'execrable' paper is concerned everyone told me that it was no big deal what the quality of the paper was so I did the obvious thing and have been paying for it ever since. Note if you need better quality paper for some project all you need to do is ask, you HAVEN'T so far. I'm sorry you got bent out of shape james
(4 / 6)
Date: July 27, 1988 08:06
From: ERNIE::OHARA
To: @SYS$MAIL:ENGINEER,@SYS$MAIL:TEAMTACO,OHARA
Thank you all for your responses, it is clear to me that alot could be read into a name. I will make sure that things are taken care of more responsibly in the future. However, wouldn't it be more confidential to shred things right away, for example; have a shredder in the printer room (they are made to feed like trash cans and are somewhat sealed so the dust is minimal and don't sound any louder then a line printer these days) and shred the stuff daily and have the janitors throw it away every night. This would heighten the security of our operation somewhat, since it now stacks up in the warehouse until there are enough boxes to make it worthwhile to call Mobile Shredding, the boxes are unattended, and not locked up (no room for this). just a suggestion, thanks james
(5 / 6)
Date: July 27, 1988 12:58
From: KIM::MARGOLIN
To: OHARA,MARGOLIN
We had our own shredder and did our own shredding. When it broke the company decided not to fix it because sending it out was supposedly cheaper. By the way, the printer room is scheduled to disappear. The printers will go in the computer room. (Bad place for a shredder.) Nonetheless, it would be nice to have our own shredder again. Jed
(6 / 6)
Date: July 27, 1988 13:20
From: ERNIE::OHARA
To: KIM::MARGOLIN,OHARA
I agree, new shredders have been sealed somewhat to cut down on the dust whether this is enough or not I don't know. Also a shredder up to the volume we seem to generate costs about $3 or 4 grand. Also, please except my apologies for snapping back at you yesterday. thanks james
Jul 26, 1988