(1 / 5)
Date: August 01, 1986 10:48
From: KIM::SALWITZ
To: @SYS$MAIL:JUNK
Rob Rowe will not be in today.. His sitter quit on him. Why does not this fine, modern, progressive company provide day care? I myself am fortunate enough not to have children at this time. So I personally have no need for daycare (and neither do my children!) However, it seems to me that it makes good business sence to provide at least some assistance with the care of the children of Atari personnel. Reason (1): The company has a stake in the welfare of its employees. It is pretty obvious that if an employee is streching his/herself and his/her paycheck in order to provide for the safe and reliable care for children that that persons performance will be effected. Reason (2): Companies that provide day care resources are more attractive to future and current employees. These companies can pick and choose from a much larger set of "quality " employees. Reason (3): By creating a common resource of this type the company brings together its employees. This bonding solidifies the company. Reason (4): This type of benifit communicates the companies commitment to its employees. It shows the employee that the company is here to stay and that while it exists it will care for its people. This is the type of company that wins. jfs.
(2 / 5)
Date: August 01, 1986 11:04
From: KIM::BEHENSKY
To: @SYS$MAIL:JUNK
I agree with John; day care would be an important plus for Atari and its employees. Given the number of single mothers in the work force, daycare would be especially important in attracting and retaining qualified women employees. Max Behensky
(3 / 5)
Date: August 01, 1986 12:29
From: KIM::SUTTLES
To: @SYS$MAIL:JUNK,SUTTLES
A question: Which cross-section of the population is larger--single parents, or plural parents who both work? I don't have any idea. But there would be more benefit than Max suggests. sas
(4 / 5)
Date: August 01, 1986 14:53
From: KIM::MOSER
To: @SYS$MAIL:JUNK
I agree with John Salwitz, Max Behensky and Steve Suttles. Day care would be a very real asset to Atari. My husband and I haven't any children at this time but who knows what the future will bring, and judging from the number of weddings and engagements we've had recently it looks like many of our employees will need this kind of service. I particularly agree with John's point about how a Day Care facility at Atari would create bonds among our employees. It would probably do this better than a dozen parties or picnics. (Not that we don't need these too.) There might be other benefits too, we'd have a built in group of kids for Focus Tests, if they could reach the controls! Kris Moser
(5 / 5)
Date: August 01, 1986 16:14
From: KIM::ALBAUGH
To: @SYS$MAIL:JUNK
Once upon a time in a castle named 1501 McCarthy, I started seriously lobbying for something several of us had discussed back in 1272 (the FIRST time). The idea was that Atari, with some 7000 employees and a soon-to-be-completed "Corporate Campus" bringing us all together could really benefit from company sponsored daycare. I don't think anybody at that time felt it should be free, just subsidized in the same way as the cafeteria, perhaps just by providing space. Kris's comment about the focus groups was also mentioned, and even more relevant then, as Atari was heavily into educational uses of home computers. Anyway, there was a lot of support for the idea at my level and below, and nearly none above me, so I eventually got discouraged and gave up. It seems wierd to me now to hear it all come up again just as I am about to become a potential customer. Anyway, if anybody's counting votes (and if they matter) mine is yes. Mike
Aug 01, 1986